Saturday, 29 December 2012

Foreign Bodies - an aberration

I blame my miserable failure to report on our December meeting on Twitter rather than Christmas preparations. Somehow, in comparison to Twitter, other forms of new media seem rather dated. I've been following England cricket and cricketers in India, Miranda Hart, various friends of Celia's to get a taste of student life (makes me feel ancient), Laura's school, my personal trainer, the district and piccadilly lines (very useful) and so on. All very distracting when there is a blog to write.

So, back to Cynthia Ozick's novel, Foreign Bodies, which we discussed at a December meeting at Sally J's (complete with festive stollen and a potentially large dog with a wagging tail). I was not alone in wishing that I was more familiar with Henry James' The Ambassadors which had so inspired Ozick in writing this book. The book is about belonging (there is a strong Jewish theme) and isolation, personal journeys of assimilation and integration into society on either side of the Atlantic. Both New York and Los Angeles seem unscathed by war whereas the Paris which is depicted in this novel is a sad, drab place which has become a transit lounge for the flotsam and jetsam of European refugees in the years after the war. It is only the wealthy young American tourists who play at being existentialists in left bank cafes. Real life is very much grittier.

The characters, not all of whom we thought were entirely credible and certainly not likeable, exist as islands, continually failing to empathise and communicate with each other. The novel's success relies on a lack of communication and the story would not have been possible in this form had it been in a contemporary setting - email, mobile phones and Skype would have undermined the basic premise of how difficult it is to trace people and maintain contact with them. There was a general appreciation of Ozick's spare and restrained style of writing and it was definitely a good book group read which provoked a number of interesting discussions.

Our January meeting is with the men and we will meet at Caroline's on 24th January. The men were given the task of choosing the book for this occasion and were unable to reach a consensus. So the choice is one or more of Ian McEwan's cold war novel Sweet Tooth, This Blinding Absence of Light by the Moroccan writer Tahar Ben Jalloun and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by Solzhenitsyn. Other than the fact that they are all short books, a theme will emerge.

Wednesday, 31 October 2012

Women Who Read

Here, for your contemplation in a quiet moment, is a link to a Pinterest blog comprising a rather lovely collection of paintings of women reading: Women Who Read (Art). It's full of peaceful and relaxing images and I'm pretty sure that Leonora or Florence must be amongst them.

I'm new to Pinterest blogs but have concluded that the name has nothing to do with Harold, plays or pauses, but instead is a combination of pin (as in board) and interest (as in hobby or enthusiasm). Quite how a picture of a pumpkin cheesecake has made it onto Women Who Read is a mystery.

Monday, 29 October 2012

The Good Soldier is a good debate

What an excellent book group read Ford Maddox Ford's The Good Soldier turned out to be; views on it diverged so sharply that we had A Good Debate last Tuesday evening at Alison's. Those who liked it really liked it .....and, as one of those who was less enthusiastic, I was left feeling rather shallow for my lack of appreciation of the book.

It is an old fashioned read, that's for sure, but at the time (written in 1915 and set a little earlier) it must have been both shocking in content and ground-breaking in form and style. We are used to and are comfortable with novels which are non-chronological and which use flashbacks to tell a story and so, perhaps, it is this familiarity with form which makes it easy to underestimate the novelty and achievement of The Good Soldier.

Whilst I didn't much care for any of the characters, I admit that there is something intriguing about Dowell, the narrator, since he is manipulated by virtually everyone else and his naivety is staggering. He too is a device; he is unreliable (not necessarily a good thing in a narrator) and as the story of the web of disintegrating relationships between Dowell, Florence, Edward and Leonora unfolds nothing is as Dowell has originally revealed to us.

We agreed that by setting his characters in an aimless vacuum of European spas with no need to earn a living and no family to distract them, Ford isolates them and allows them to be morally and spiritually lost (and, as a result, completely dishonest with each other). With no outside forces, the reader realises early on that they are unsympathetic characters on a destructive course..... the book's opening sentence sets it up: "This is the saddest story I have ever heard".

We meet again on 28th November at Sally J's when we will be discussing hopefully happier themes having read Foreign Bodies by Cynthia Ozick, a novel inspired by Henry James by a writer who worshiped him. It is a choice which met Alison's challenge of finding a book which starts with a letter.

Thursday, 11 October 2012

Man Booker shortlist on radio 4

I'm thoroughly enjoying the Today programme's interviews this week with the shortlisted authors for the Man Booker prize. However, they don't always do a good selling job on their books. This morning it was the turn of Jeet Thayil to speak about his novel, Narcopolis. Thayil has an interesting personal story; he is a highly educated, recovered alcoholic and opium addict from India's intellectual classes who has published this, his first novel, at the age of 52. It is set in the opium dens of Bombay (as it then was) in the 1970s and 80s and is obviously personal in many ways. So far, so interesting. But as soon as I learnt that the first sentence is six and a half pages long, I turned off (not literally). Now, it may be that this is a completely contextually justified, poetic, narcotic dream-like sequence, but what an off-putting thought; and as a reformed lawyer, I would find it hard to resist punctuating this mega-sentence.

In comparison, Monday's entertaining interview with a chirpy Hilary Mantel whet the appetite for the third book in the Thomas Cromwell trilogy. After she won the prize for Woolf Hall in 2009 she was reported as having plans to spend the winnings on "sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll". Rebecca Jones politely asked her how this went, only to be told that it was "hideously disappointing"and that paying off the mortgage was a "bigger imperative". Maybe she'll have more fun if she wins second time around.

Thursday, 20 September 2012

Chiswick Book Festival - how could I have missed it?

September is one of those months where the balance between my work life and my domestic life always teeters on a knife edge. It is something to do with being inundated with post-holiday catch up and returns to school and university, made all the worse this year by it being the Olympic and Paralympic national hangover season. So I am used to missing birthdays and deadlines for special offers in September, but that is no excuse for missing the Chiswick Book Festival. It took place last weekend and I am kicking myself for not going as it is an intensely local and intimate affair (unlike the much larger, longer and geographically more widespread Richmond Literature Festival).

Reports from friends who attended were that it was an excellent affair. A N Wilson spoke engagingly about his book about Wedgwood, The Potter's Hand - and why I weep for Wedgwood. There was a full house and a good Q&A session for military historian Antony Beevor who presented on his mighty book The Second World War. And it was standing room only for our new national treasure and local hero, Clare Balding, who was interviewed by India Knight. I notice that Anne Sebba also took part, speaking about That Woman (see That Woman for the book group's views) and I would have been tempted by a talk by Michael Palin in Chiswick House (one of my all time favourite locations and a real gem of a house).

Clearly, a touch of diary management is needed to make sure I don't miss it next year.


Wednesday, 12 September 2012

Our late summer meeting

For the first time for ages, every member of the Book Group was able to attend our lively and enjoyable meeting at Sally D's on Monday; it was lovely, if rather noisy, to have a full house. Once we had dealt with holidays, the Olympics, the reopening of Sally J's shop and other topics, we discussed our summer reading which, as ever, was extensive and varied. Mine has already been recorded on the blog: Holiday Reading and edited highlights of others' follow.

We can always rely on Maria to weigh in with a huge tome and she didn't disappoint. Jerusalem by Simon Sebag Montefiore is enormous (one of the largest books I can remember seeing - 768 pages!); Maria reported that progress was slow but that she would persist: we await updates. Lucy had already read and enjoyed it but confessed that it took her six months. Not to be outdone in the contest for reading the longest book of the summer, Lucy said she couldn't put down Claire Tomalin's biography Charles Dickens: A Life (a mere 576 pages).

In lighthearted contrast, Ann was addicted to The Hunger Games trilogy (see the blog in May: The Hunger Games) and Catherine had joined The Song of Achilles fan club whilst also enjoying Heartburn by Nora Ephron

Sally D had had a depressing time reading Norwegian Wood which she pronounced was better than A Wild Sheep Chase which we had read together last November (A Wild Sheep Chase) however, she thought that Murakami's work contains too many suicides. She wasn't cheered up much by The Art of Fielding. Caroline spoke, as a true fan, about David Mitchell's book The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet and urged us to try it even if we had hated Cloud Atlas.  Alison recommended All That I Am, Anna Funder's first novel (we all enjoyed Stasiland a few years ago).

Primed by an efficient email and Culture Show recommendation from Sally D, we will meet again on 23 October to discuss Ford Maddox Ford's The Good Soldier. This inevitably led to eulogising about Parade's End, its beautiful period interiors, classy acting and wonderful parts for women (oh, and I confessed to an unseemly crush on Rebecca Hall).  It was a good evening no doubt in part due to the fact that Sally always provides us with excellent wine. I was tempted by the tote bag I saw this week with the slogan "My book group only reads wine labels". 

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Man Booker shortlist

I'm so pleased to learn today that Hilary Mantel is on the Man Booker shortlist for Bring Up the Bodies which I thought was stupendously brilliant. Of course, she won the prize in 2009 for Wolf Hall so the chances of her doing the double must be about the same as Arsenal's this year. However, with dishy Dan Stevens as one of the judges (how on earth did he find time to read 146 books?) I can only be hopeful of further success for Thomas Cromwell and the court of Henry VIII. It sounds like Will Self will provide serious competition though.

In a weak moment earlier, I thought I should follow Dan on Twitter given his current high profile, obvious taste, intelligence and all round fabulous gorgeousness. I now discover that @thatdanstevens has over 44,000 followers but says nothing remotely interesting and surely must be a spoof. The next best thing is @ManBookerPrize which has been updating me this evening on the shortlist party (of course, there just has to be a party) and which provided me with this photo, although Dan has his serious and rather earnest face on.


Monday, 27 August 2012

Holiday Reading

That I read almost 5 books in a glorious fortnight in Sardinia is a testament to the Olympic legacy of lethargy and laziness which prevailed during our family holiday. We all lounged, read, swam, ate, drank and repeated this cycle for 14 days - and nobody complained. We had bought the girls Kobos, the WH Smith budget e-reader; whilst not as good as Kindles, they did the trick and provided hours of reading. Celia, employing student tactics, downloaded all the free books (almost exclusively classics) and proceeded to work her way through Jane Austen and Thomas Hardy.

Meanwhile, my Kindle and I predictably enjoyed Skios by Michael Frayn which is a perfect holiday read and is laugh out loud funny. It was a light hearted contrast to Pure by Andrew Miller, the rather dour but beautifully executed tale of the excavation of an overflowing cemetery in pre-revolutionary Paris. I can understand why it won the Costa Award in 2011 and it is, despite the subject matter, a really rather touching story.

Mrs Robinson's Disgrace: the Private Diary of a Victorian Lady by Kate Summerscale shares many of the characteristics and much of the style of The Suspicions of Mr Whicher and is an interesting social history of sex, divorce, diaries and health fads in the 1850s but I found the underlying facts less engaging: were Mrs R's diaries a scandalously true record of an affair or a fantasy crush and was she suffering from various real or imagined illnesses - this was for the reader, as well as the judges of the newly constituted divorce court, to decide. The illustration of a Victorian husband's total dominance of his wife was a vivid reminder of social and economic oppression and dual standards - a husband even owned the copyright in his wife's writings.

But for me, the read of the fortnight was, without fail, Bring Up the Bodies another huge novel by Hilary Mantel, which picks up the story of Thomas Cromwell at Wolf Hall and Henry VIII's introduction to Jane Seymour. I found it a completely compelling and absorbing book and loved every minute of it; in fact, I thought that the descriptions of the politics and diplomacy of the Tudor court were even better than in Wolf Hall. Her habit of referring to Cromwell as "he" persists but her editors have obviously tackled this so that there are countless references to "he, Cromwell" which, whilst clunky, is helpful (and there seemed to be fewer Thomases this time round). I can't wait for what I assume will be the third and final book even though, obviously, we know how the story ends.

And so now, it is back to the post- holiday laundry...... although, on second thoughts, perhaps there's the fifth book to finish first.




Thursday, 9 August 2012

Book maze

Whilst London is hosting the biggest and best party in the world, the South Bank is doing its bit and is jumping with activities and attractions. If you get the chance, loose yourself in aMAZEme, the book maze in the foyer of the Royal Festival Hall, and you will become immersed in 250,000 books. Visitors are encouraged to browse and so it can be a more protracted experience than you might expect. Here is my own little book worm "lost" in the middle of the maze.

Tuesday, 31 July 2012

The Literary Gift Company

A little plug for this online retailer of literary gifts, which is presently offering a 15% discount. A good place for presents book lovers from mugs and cushions to earrings and t-shirts and I rather like their stationery collection. Find them at: Literary Gift Company.

Friday, 20 July 2012

Mornings in Jenin

At a well attended meeting last night we shared our views on Mornings in Jenin by Susan Abulhawa. It turned out to be one of those books which provoked a good deal of interesting discussion but one on which we largely shared similar thoughts. One reason for this might perhaps be because none of us had the political or historical insights and depth of knowledge needed to challenge this most moving and beautifully crafted Palestinian story. We acknowledged that it was a one-sided account of a sustained period of devastating conflict (the story opens in 1941 in Palestine and ends, under Jewish fire, on the West Bank in 2002) but we felt that this was acceptable as it was the story of one Palestinian family's struggle, generation after generation, to survive endless political turmoil, violence and war. The portraits of the Jewish characters are more one dimensional and less powerful than the wonderful and very moving characterisation of Amal, her parents and friends.

There is a strong sense in this book of the importance of land - the family lived off the land, cultivated the land, were dispossessed of it and yearned for it throughout the book. And, in my view, the writing is at its most poignant and moving when the author describes the land and what it means to Amal's family. An early sentence illustrates this exquisitely:


In a distant time, before history marched over the hills and shattered present and future, before wind grabbed the land at one corner and shook it of its name and character, before Amal was born, a small village east of Haifa lived quietly on figs and olives, open frontiers and sunshine.


It's enough to make you weep at the outset and a number of us last night confessed to tears as the story progressed. This is a book which educates you about the Palestinians and their cause, provokes you to think about the Middle East and linger longer over the news stories and which undoubtedly stays with you. As Huda (what a sage and honest character) says to Amal on her return from the US: "The roots of our grief coil so deeply into loss.....Our anger is a rage that Westerners cannot understand. Our sadness can make the stones weep." Anything I write is inadequate to explain the beauty and sadness of this book.

Sunday, 15 July 2012

Fifty Shades of Grey - a confession

Ok, it's best to be honest about it from the start. Despite my sniping, cynicism and earlier blogs, as soon as I discovered that EL James lives locally in Brentford and that her son is at Laura's school, I had to read the porno sensation that is Fifty Shades of Grey. What's more, I now learn that very many of my friends (nameless of course) have read it.

What is there left to say? Well, everyone knows that there is no sex until about a third of the way through the book but that the second two thirds certainly make up for it. And everyone knows that it is not a literary masterpiece (I'm trying hard to be polite here); I lost count of the number of times the heroine refers to her "inner goddess" but it is irritating on each and every occasion. And everyone knows that it is the fastest selling paperback of all time and that Kindle downloads are massive (last week one electrical retailer held Fifty Shades responsible for a 71% increase in Kindle sales). And now the Sunday papers tell us that the book is responsible for a massive increase in the sale of sex toys, including a "beginners bondage kit"- yours for £17. We are told that sales of nipple clamps are up by 330%, riding crops by 200% and jiggle balls - read the book if you don't know - by 653%. Indeed, the first hit (excuse the pun) I got when googling the title of the book was to sextoys.co.uk followed, unintentionally I imagine, by sainsburysentertainment.co.uk although I don't think you'll find nipple clamps on the supermarket shelves.

However, my favourite reflection in the Sundays on this topic concerns the speculation about who will play the leads in the film (the content of the film itself is mind-boggling). Whilst Michael Fassbender and Scarlett Johansson might seem likely contenders in Hollywood, I prefer the quirky British dream team of Benedict Cumberbatch and Miranda Hart: "such fun!"

Tuesday, 10 July 2012

Reading on the tube

Here's a link to a delightful Tumblr blog (pictures, not words) celebrating reading on the New York subway Underground New York Public Library. It is a joy and there really ought to be a London Underground equivalent. I've looked and whilst I can find blogs on the history of the tube, tube etiquette, tube art and underground music (busking that is), I've found nothing on books or reading habits. In any event, my curiosity about other people's reading habits has recently been frustrated by the number of Kindles (full of dirty secrets I wonder?) on the District Line.

Rather bizarrely, my research for this post has thrown up a Reading (the place, but you can understand Google's confusion) baking club (who knew there were such things) where the July challenge is to bake something inspired by a London underground station. Suggestions include carrot cake for Warren Street, marmalade cake for Paddington, marble cake for Marble Arch and so on. The rules state that cup cakes, brownies and muffins are not allowed but that, unlike our book group, men may participate. It's meant to be fun but I think I'll stick with the olives, peanuts and sauvignon blanc at our book group meetings.

Thursday, 28 June 2012

Abdication

Anyone wanting to read further about Edward VIII and Wallace Simpson might consider Abdication by Juliet Nicolson which I heard discussed on Woman's Hour this morning. It is a first novel by an established and published historian which is set in 1936 (the year of the 3 Kings). Nicolson's fictional characters become entwined in real events, notably the affair between the King and Mrs S at a time when there was a news blackout on the subject in the UK. During today's radio interview she said that she wanted her protagonist (19 year old May, a recent arrival from Barbados who has a position as chauffeur to the government Chief Whip) to be "in the room" with Mrs S and the King; having read the Mrs S biography, I am happy to get a view, albeit fictional, on the nature of their relationship. Abdication has received a warm reviews in the press, the Times labelling it as "ideal for the intelligent deckchair". 

Thursday, 21 June 2012

That Woman

The book group met at Alison's this week and we enjoyed a lively discussion on Anne Sebba's biography of Wallace Simpson which, we felt, was an especially topical read at the time of the Diamond Jubilee.

Although there were criticisms of some of Anne Sebba's more speculative views about Wallace's health and gender identity, there was no doubting her opinion that Wallace was really all about money, position, jewels and the high life. What's more, we were able to agree with at least one of her conclusions that, as a nation, we owed Mrs S a debt of gratitude for relieving us of a weak, self-centred, immature and petulant monarch. Lucy  observed that it was rather reassuring that there was a consensus amongst the politicians who mattered (except Churchill) that the King really had to go. Certainly, we reflected, his apparent lack internal struggle over his role and his duty must surely have influenced his brother and niece (not to mention the Queen Mother who appeared to have been key to the refusal of the family to rehabilitate the ex-King).

There is a real problem, though, with a biography which is about two people who are really not very attractive characters. None of us liked either of them and we felt that they were both shallow creatures who deserved each other, despite Anne Sebba's theory that Wallis got in too deep and never intended to marry the King.

The book itself suffers a little from having too much detail about extraneous matters (surely an editor should have curbed this tendency). It also is imbalanced as the last 20 years or so of Wallace's life are dealt with in a matter of a few short chapters leaving a number of unexplored themes: why was Maitre Blum so controlling and influential, who did Wallace leave her assets to (we know her jewellery sold for $50 million but nothing is said about her will) and what really was the nature of the relationship between the couple in their later years - they certainly rarely looked happy.

Our next book is a Palestinian story, Mornings in Jenin by Susan Abulhawa. We will meet at my house on Thursday 19th July for the last hurrah before the "free reading" of the summer holidays when, of course, everyone will read Skios by Michael Frayn now that we know that it is a "highbrow beach read". Oh, and for the record, we only spent a fairly short time discussing Fifty Shades of Grey (although the Youtube clip caused riotous laughter).

Friday, 8 June 2012

Lucky Break

Regular readers (goodness, that sounds so presumptuous), will know that I have a bit of a thing for the theatre and have previously blogged about the memoirs of former National Theatre directors, Peter Hall and Richard Eyre. In keeping with this occasional theme, I have just finished Lucky Break by Esther Freud, a tale of a group of students starting off together at an elite London drama school and which follows their progress in life, love, TV, film and theatre over the next decade or so.

Although I found the episodic nature of the narrative rather irritating (too many incomplete half stories) I liked the way in which Freud does not allow the reader to have a favourite amongst her group of characters. We cannot predict who will be the success on stage or screen and who will end up waitressing for life or touring the provinces as a pantomime horse. Will it be gorgeous Charlie, beautiful, long limbed, lean and insecurely obsessed about the occasional spot or loyal, slightly dull and dumpy Nell or perhaps ambitious Dan who aspires to be the Hamlet of his generation who will make it to the big time? Or one of Freud's other sharply drawn characters.

This is not Esther Freud at her best, in my view, but it is an entertaining read punctuated with wry humour which shines a light on the insecurities of life as a young actor and the absurdities of thinking that every missed phone call might be the lucky break.

Thursday, 31 May 2012

Orange Prize for Achilles

How thrilling that this year's Orange Prize, the last under that sponsorship, has been award to Madeline Miller for her wonderful book The Song of Achilles. Bravo! In awarding the prize last night, the judges described it as: "inventive, passionate, uplifting and different". I agree.

I have previously blogged about this book (My Greek Crush) and can only offer endless thanks to Caroline for spotting, reading and recommending it in January. Classics is certainly having its day at the moment: think Antigone at the National Theatre this summer, Mary Beard and her Romans on the TV and, coincidentally as I type this, I am listening to a trailer for Melvyn Bragg's In Our Time at 9am this morning on Radio 4 which is about the Trojan wars. Maybe, in an age of conflict and tension, we feel that the classics have a particular resonance at the moment. As Madeline Miller graciously said last night: "Classics will always keep you humble".

Sunday, 20 May 2012

Book group rules

I have stumbled across an amusing entry about book groups in a blog (hilarious and scary in equal measures) called The Middle Class Handbook. The entry "5 Ways To Kill Your Book Group" provides me with the opportunity to laud our gatherings, discussions and choices. Amongst things which are fatal are, apparently, over ambitious theming (e.g. food that goes with the book choice - heaven forbid); instead "crisps and olives will do" so we can confidently tick that box. We are warned against "too much Sauvignon Blanc" on the basis that the conversation nosedives and mid-week hangovers will act as a deterrent to regular attendance (a bold assumption). On balance, we can tick that box too as we usually imbibe no more than modestly.

However, I thought that we could robustly rebut the the final piece of advice, headlined "Middlemarch" which is that classics are the death knell to a book group. "Attempt anything pre-1900 and over 450 pages and your book group will shrivel up an die". Well, at least in part.......as I have an aversion to any book that long. My immediate thought was that we have on the whole, and perhaps with the exception of the impenetrable Evelina by Fanny Burney, been quite successful in our choice of classics. Think Madame Bouvary last year, The Europeans, Jane Eyre and I think some Hardy before that. On reflection, though, I discover that our preference is for classics which post-date1900: so Scoop earlier this year and previously Revolutionary Road, Wild Sargasso Sea, Brighton Rock, The Razors Edge and Dusty Answer. So perhaps the advice is worth heeding after all.

If you've two minutes to spare, listen to Martha Kearney's recent short report on book groups and booze on the World At One: Does booze ruin book groups And now, it's about time for my early evening class of Sauvignon Blanc.

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

The Hunger Games - what's the fuss all about?

I have been cajoled, persuaded and nagged into reading the teen sensation that is The Hunger Games by the enthusiasm and obsession of Laura who, at 13, is probably Suzanne Collins' target audience. In my defence, I know an alarming number of adults who have read it (some have devoured the trilogy) and one book group which is reading it at the moment. It is one of those books which has become a cult read and it isn't all bad. For one thing, it has a strong heroine and female role model in the delightfully named Katniss Everdene. She has the measure of the boys in most things - she might not be as physically strong but she's clever, thoughtful and wily and regularly outwits them; she keeps her emotions in check and gives little away. She is the Ray Mears of her dystopian future world since what she doesn't know about survival skills, the natural world and hunting for food isn't worth knowing. She is not worried about fashion, looks or popularity; and she has a strong sense of loyalty and morality - unusual characteristics in this reality TV world in which 24 teenagers are engaged in a fight to the death at the 74th Annual Hunger Games.

The prose is undemanding, straightforward stuff. If you can cope with "The day is glorious, with a blue sky and soft breeze. The food's wonderful, with cheese seeping through the warm bread" and so on you will find yourself engaged in this imaginary world with extremes of poverty and plenty and the domination of the masses by the elite few at its core.

My advice? See the film which is almost word for word from the book. And the sequel is being released on 22 November 2013 (yes, that's 2013) which date is already marked in red in Laura's diary.

Thursday, 3 May 2012

You Deserve Nothing

Despite being set in an international high school full of Americans, our lively discussion at Catherine's last night of Alexander Maksik's first novel You Deserve Nothing was profoundly French. We spoke of philosophy and literature, Sartre and Camus, cafes and Paris, teenagers and sex (quite a lot of the latter as it turns out).

It was a good book group read which provoked some interesting and animated views. Were we being especially conscientious in our debate in order to impress Lucy who attended for the first time I wonder? There was general agreement that it was well written and that Paris provides a dazzlingly seductive and atmospheric backdrop to the novel. There was some disagreement about the credibility and depth of some of the characters although we all thought that Will was perfectly portrayed and totally believable as a teacher who inspired, albeit one who ultimately disappointed his pupils with his moral ambiguity and failure to live up to the ideas he taught. We thought that the the storyline's weakness is its inevitability and so the ending is predictable. There were comparisons with Ian McEwan's On Chesil Beach and with Julian Barnes' A Sense of an Ending (which I suppose if you are a first time author might be rather thrilling if they hadn't come from a book group in Kew) in terms of the tone, pace and some of the characterisations.

So an enjoyable read and a lively evening.......all the more so once we started discussing Fifty Shades of Grey. In the interests of research and in order to demystify this, here is a link to BBC Newsnight's solidly respectable Paul Mason's "business" interview with the author which includes some extracts from the book and a warning not to google S&M: Newsnight. Apparently, it sold 2 million copies in 4 weeks in the US and the popularity of erotic "literature" seems to have grown exponentially with the growth of the Kindle (you don't have to buy it in a shop and no one knows what you're reading on the tube). Alarmingly, the BBC piece also refers to the growth in paranormal erotic literature: "that's bonking vampires and bonking trolls" according to Mason. I'm not sure that I'll ever be able to listen to his views on quantitive easing in quite the same way again.

We meet again at Alison's on 18th June when we will discuss Anne Sebba's biography of Wallace Simpson, That Woman. By then some of us will, no doubt, also have views to share on frisky vampires and trolls.

Sunday, 8 April 2012

My Greek Crush

How best to describe my current crush ........this picture of Achilles (or Brad posing as Achilles) sums it up. He's a good deal more decorative than the book cover, but The Song of Achilles by Madeline Miller is just as gorgeous. It is original, addictive, seductive, transporting and an absolute joy. I have been completely distracted by her retelling of the life and times of Achilles, his friendship with Patroclus and the Trojan wars in a way which I would never have thought possible before starting the book. Miller, a classicist who spent 10 years on her interpretation of one of the great Greek tales, has written a book in the finest traditions of story telling which is a curious mix of ancient and modern. The story is rewritten for the modern reader (no prior knowledge is necessary) but still feels entirely classical. I'm sure that purists might regard this as pop classics but what on earth is wrong with that. For more, see previous blog entries: Classic choices for the new year and Orange prize long list. Gaze on him then read and enjoy!

Friday, 23 March 2012

The National Theatre: part 2

Last year I reported on Peter Hall's memoirs of his time as director of the National Theatre (see the blog at Theatrical tales) and now I can mention Richard Eyre's account of his time in the same job, National Service: Diary of a Decade. It was another fascinating and enjoyable read which gave a real insight into the pressures of running such a complex theatre. I had not really previously stopped to think of how many plays run there every year and the artistic and financial planning that entails. But that, of course, is only a fraction of a job which  requires management, ambassadorial, political, literary and artistic skills. The joy of a diary format is that you live the highs and lows with the writer and patterns emerge - the fear of having chosen the wrong play and of having cast it poorly, the frustration and exhilaration in roughly equal measures during the rehearsal process, the anxiety during previews and press night and so on.

This book has a rich cast of characters: not just the actors (delightful sketches of many well known names), directors and support staff who are at its heart but also politicians such as Thatcher, Major, Kinnock and Blair (and various Secretaries of State for the arts who do not always have an appreciation of their subject) as well as royalty. Eyre displays a keen sense of humour and frequently ends a diary entry by recalling a joke or a wickedly amusing comment. Add to this Eyre's easy and sensitive prose style, and you have a delightfully engaging bedtime read.

Eyre took a sabbatical during his time at the NT during which time he wrote his autobiography Utopia and Other Places. I shall add it to my list.

Thursday, 15 March 2012

Reflections on Scoop

The book group met at Caroline's last night where we discussed many things (as ever) including our views on Evelyn Waugh's novel Scoop. In a lively exchange of views we all realised that it seemed funnier and more absurd in the retelling than it did in the reading, and that was without trying to read aloud some of the hilarious telegrams that Boot received from his Fleet Street masters during his time in Ishmaelia. We agreed that it felt very dated, that we had all taken a little while to become enthusiastic about it (to a greater or lesser extent) and that we found some of the colonial undertones patronising and the non PC language quite shocking and jarring. However, there was a consensus that it was sharply well observed and throughly entertaining. A classic, perhaps, and although it feels very much of its time, its satire on journalism is enduring and as apposite today as in 1938 when it was written.

Some high level research (sounds good, but of course I refer to Wikipedia) reveals that Waugh based the novel on his experiences in Abyssinia for the Daily Mail. Boot was supposedly modelled on the young William Deedes who apparently arrived in Abyssinia with "a quarter of a ton of baggage" just as Boot arrived with his cleft sticks, canoe, Christmas lunch with all the trimmings etc. As Sally J remarked with feeling, "typical man..... all the gear, no idea!"

We meet again on 2nd May and in the meantime we will all read You Deserve Nothing by Alexander Maksik, a novel set in Paris which has been recommended by Isla in the Kew Bookshop; the reviews suggest that it provokes a range of opinions and so it should give rise to a spirited discussion after Easter.

Saturday, 10 March 2012

Orange Prize long list

Caroline has shown remarkable prescience in her recommendation of Madeline Miller's book The Song of Achilles (see the blog at Classic choices for the new year) for it has just been long listed for the Orange Prize. Miller appears to be one of the few unknown authors on this year's list (you will recognise the names of many of the others). This has prompted David Lister to ask, in today's Independent, whether we still need an prize exclusively for women authors. He points out that in this week's WH Smith fiction charts 13 of the top 20 paperbacks and 12 of the top 20 hardbacks are by women. On those statistics, he has a point (although I've not looked at the WH Smith charts so it may be that they are stuffed full of Katie Price books which would undermine his point). However, to my mind the prize has added interest and relevance since all the judges are women as is the governing committee (the most recent addition to this being Martha Lane Fox). And as a book group we seem to respond well to the Orange prize since I think we have read, either collectively or individually, many of the past winners (think Bel Canto, On Beauty, Half of a Yellow Sun, Small Island and many others). The shortlist is announced on 17 April and the winner on 29 May by which time I am determined to have read The Song of Achilles.

Thursday, 1 March 2012

Inspiration from other book groups (part 2)

I can pompously announce that this is now an annual feature (well, at least, this time last year I reported on the reading habits of other book groups and it feels about the right time to do it again). My research leads me to believe that there are both clear similarities and wide differences in the styles of book groups in west and south west London.

So whilst, predictably, The Sense of an Ending, appears to have been prescribed reading for virtually every book group last year and many groups are reading or have recently read Before I Go To Sleep by SJ Watson, the differences in reading habits are stark and I suspect reflect the personalities of the book groups.

From a Chiswick group, a report on A Fine Balance by Rohinton Mistry which I am told is definitely a top 10 book. The reviews I have read confirm that this indeed the case and I've just downloaded it onto the Kindle.

I can't resist reporting on a Chiswick/Barnes group which I normally admire for their erudite choices, which has been reading One Moment, One Morning by Sarah Rayner. I am told it is embarrassingly bad and a front runner for a bad sex in literature award; the suggestion was that it had been chosen whilst blindfolded in Tesco!

A Sheen group generally follows a similar pattern to us, working through a cycle of different genres. However, having read Middlemarch (noted as a book to revisit in retirement!) and The Dubliners (apparently not a popular choice) in the last twelve months, they are now tackling Anna Karenina and so are obviously binging on classics. I admire their fortitude.

An edgy Chiswick group has been reading Annabel, a debut novel by Canadian author Kathleen Winter. It is, I am told, a story about an intersex baby and follows the decisions the parents make about deciding whether it should become a girl or a boy and the consequences of that choice. They have also recently read Let the Great World Spin by Colum McCann, a novel set on the day that Philippe Petit did his high wire walk between the Twin Towers. There is, of course, a proximity to 9/11 and McCann's family was touched by the events of that day although the novel is firmly planted in the drama of Petit's extraordinary walk in 1974. I am fascinated by the idea. Read the review here [Guardian review] if you are.

Pure by Andrew Miller won this year's Costa award and is the current choice of groups in both Ealing and Kew. The Kew group in question (and I know of at least 3) has great ambition as they choose two books at each meeting (something that is a rarity for us - we know our limitations!). They obviously have a theme going on around capital cities; Pure, a historical novel, is set in Paris and their second choice this month is very contemporary, Rivers of London by Ben Aaronovitch. I have looked at a few reviews and they all refer to it as an "urban fantasy" for which I read "thriller" so perhaps not for me.

Finally, a report not on content but process. A friend told me that her Twickenham group had had their "AGM" recently. Upon questioning, it turns out that this is an excuse to drink champagne rather than wine and to plan their reading for the next 12 months. They choose, in advance, 6 books for a 12 month period (in alternate months they meet to discuss what else they have read). This year's reading will culminate with a Dickens novel and themed candlelit dinner (for which I'm assuming costumes will be required). Talk about setting the bar high for the rest of us.

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

Cocktail Hour under the Tree of Forgetfulness

A quick mention for this thoroughly entertaining and, on occasions, quite poignant book of reminiscences  by Alexandra Fuller of her parents' alcohol sodden, peripatetic and wildly eccentric life in Africa at a time of its transition to from colonialism to independence. Her mother, the romantic, dramatic and sometimes tragic self proclaimed "Nicola Fuller of Central Africa" and Tim, her stoically supportive, pipe-smoking, salesman/nightclub bouncer/jobbing farmer father move from Kenya, to Rhodesia as it then was (leaving briefly for a couple of dull and dreary years in England) before returning to the war torn country (a farm on the border with Mozambique being a risky option for white Africans with small children) and then eventually on to Zambia, where they live today.

I've never been there and Africa is an itch which I still have to scratch but the prose is evocative (as far as I can tell) and seems to buzz with the heat, dust, smells and noises of Africa. The overriding emotion in the book is the love of the land of those who lived there: "Land is Mum's love affair and it is Dad's religion".

Whilst, with the exception of some historical background and a passing reference to 250,000 white Rhodesians being unwilling to criticise a government policy which gave them preferential treatment over 6 million blacks, this book is almost entirely devoid of the politics of colonialism and independence (which on occasions feels very odd - you can guess what the Fullers think but nothing is explicit) it is a bracingly good read for anyone who is interested in Africa or who has lived there. It is also an interesting take on a very different, sometimes delinquent and sometimes flamboyant, style of parenting..... Alexandra Fuller has a fascinating story to tell.

Thursday, 26 January 2012

The Woman in Black

Open Book this afternoon included an interview with Susan Hill about The Woman in Black. Now of course I know that it is a long running West End play and that it is soon to open as a film staring Daniel Radcliffe. I also know that it is a spooky story in a gothic sort of way, but I'm ashamed to admit that that is about it. Well, I am now enlightened and will add The Woman in Black to my growing pile of books to read.

Hill, now 70, said that the book was a bit of an experiment. She wanted to write a ghost story and thought that the only ones anyone ever really read were A Christmas Carol and The Turn of the Screw and that, in any event, ghost stories were rarely full length novels. She also wanted to return to writing after a few years break with her young daughter. She found a student who provided childcare every morning for 6 weeks and so the book had to be written in that time. Consistent with the customary efficiency of a new returner to the workplace, she did it. After some initial success, it faded. However, the novel's enduring popularity seems to be founded on its place on the GCSE and A level syllabuses - a sure way to inflate sales. And no doubt that is one reason why the play is still running and why teenage audiences will flock to the film (nothing to do with young Dan of course).

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

Classic choices for the new year

We took a pragmatic approach to classics at last night's book group meeting at Maria's. We selected a new book in part based on its length, having quickly realised that Maria's copy of North and South by Elizabeth Gaskill looked very long (I checked afterwards and 448 pages is a couple of hundred too many in my view).  At the other extreme was Ethan Frome by Edith Wharton (on Radio 4 this week) which at a mere 102 pages is a much more attractive proposition. However, we ended up compromising on a novel which ticks lots of boxes: Scoop by Evelyn Waugh is a classic, a comic novel and at 228 pages long is of manageable length.  It also seems an appropriate read at the time of the Leveson Inquiry; will it reveal the 1930s Fleet Street equivalent of phone hacking?

Since, for reasons involving various exciting travel plans (envy) we cannot meet until the beginning of March, some of us might also try to read On The Road by Jack Kerouac (does anyone have a surname with more vowels in it I wonder, unless it is the Italian branch of the family?). A novel which pulses with 1950s America will be an interesting contrast to Evelyn Waugh.

We also discussed our Christmas reading which was an eclectic mix ranging from Death Comes to Pemberley by PD James (Maria) to Back From the Brink by Alastair Darling (me..... and perhaps why I'm suddenly interested in books with laughs). Sally recommended The Cat's Table by Michael Ondaatje and Alison enjoyed The Stranger's Child by Alan Hollinghurst (I agree; I thought it was excellent and a nice take on the whole business of literary criticism too).

Caroline spoke highly of The Song of Achilles, a first novel by America classics teacher Madelaine Miller which is a modern retelling of Homer's Illiad. It has been well reviewed. According to The Independent, which liked it saying it is not a pretentious book: "Brokeback Mountain sets sail for Troy. It has all this ... without being remotely trashy. It's an entirely successful piece of writing, sitting comfortably between literary and commercial fiction genres. It does what the best novels do – it transports you to another world – as well as doing something that few novels bother to: it makes you feel incredibly clever."  That has sold it to me....must add it to the pile by the bed. Incidentally, is there a classical or Homeric revival going on? Alice Oswald's Memorial (see the blog here: Books at my bedside) was shortlisted for the TS Elliot Poetry Prize although she has withdrawn it in protest at the sponsorship of a hedge fund (I don't know the details).

We meet again at Caroline's on Wednesday 14th March; some way off so plenty of time to attack the pile.

Thursday, 12 January 2012

Comedy Classics

No, not Dad's Army or Fawlty Towers but Radio 4's Open Book has challenged readers to come up with their favourite comedy classic reads. It set me thinking: how often do I read something that really makes me laugh? Parts of The Finkler Question were laugh out loud funny, gentle chuckles accompanied Major Pettigrew's Last Stand and of course I smile, in a lady-like manner, at the irony of Jane Austen, but other than that I can't recall reading a humorous book for a long time.

Top of the Comedy Classics Pops turns out to be The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole Aged 13 3/4, followed by titles such as Three Men in a Boat, Cold Comfort Farm and Love in a Cold Climate (and many more). Whilst I have read Adrian Mole, I have never even dipped into the other three. The book group assembles next week with the mission of choosing a classic to read for our February meeting. Should we consider a comedy classic?

Sunday, 8 January 2012

The Sense of an Ending - a Post Script

I chuckled at the Londoner's Diary in Friday's Standard for, where the book group leads, so the literati follow. It is as if they had read our thoughts on the Julian Barnes novel..... or maybe they had read the blog (at The Sense of an Ending).  The Standard asked whether it was "an Emperor's new clothes moment" since, apparently, a review in the New York Times is no better than lukewarm: "It isn't terrible, it is just so...average. It is averagely compelling.....it involves and average amount of concentration and ..... it is averagely well written: excellent in its averageness!" The Standard goes on to suggest that it is what a lot of people have been thinking but haven't dare say or print. Well, ever bold...... you read it here first.